Matthew Engel

A streaming video can be found here on the bottom of this webpage.

The full presentation was uploaded onto the BNL website, and I have a copy of it here. Below, I will share some of the slides which I thought were most critical and relevant; as each could warrant a full discussion unto itself. One of Chu’s goals was to establish the idea that our world is changing. Many peoples are not prone to understanding these types of changes, or how they will affect society. However, it is important not to ignore them but study them and try and calculate how they will impact humanity. One may ask ‘Will these changes be beneficial or detrimental? Can we alter their course, can man control them? Are these changes to our world caused by man, or a byproduct of our society?’ Chu establishes three ‘myths’ which are commonly thought to be true, and present evidence to combat each myth. They are:

1. The wealth of a country is proportional to the energy it uses and its carbon footprint.
2. Energy efficiency and CO2 reductions are not affordable.
3. We have all the technology we need to solve the energy problem. It is only a matter of political will.

The graph above shows the development index of many nations in the world including the U.S., Japan, France, Netherlands, Germany, Israel etc. in proportion to their energy consumption. From here, we can see that many developed nations all across the world are able to maintain a high standard of living while having much lower energy consumption per person. Therefore, in America we have the potential to maintain or even raise our standard of living while lowering our energy consumption - this data shows that it can be done.

Here we see the energy consumption in the United States per person in kWh compared to the energy consumption in California per person. It is obvious, there is a drastic difference between the two. The average person in California uses much less energy than the average person in the U.S. Even while the per capita GDP in California doubled, its energy consumption remained flat. This was due to greater energy efficiency practices, that we could learn from. These practices would reduce our dependence on foreign oil and help reduce pollutin emissions.

I will post this now, but continue updating it over the weekend. Enjoy, and best wishes.