
One June 3rd, 2010 Nature Biotechnology hosted a ‘Meet the Author’ event at the Nature Publishing Group New York City headquarters. The invited speaker was Mark Kessel, Founder and Partner at Symphony Capital, LLC. Mr. Kessel is a world expert in innovative product development, mergers and acquisitions, and has spent the last several decades advising companies and financiers. His goal during this well attended and intimate event was to summarize the challenges facing the drug discovery endeavor and analyze previous and future scenarios in order to distill important lessons which can help the industry produce continued success. Before attending, each participant had each read an interview with Mr. Kessel and other business leaders from Bioentrepreneur entitled ‘Other ways of financing your company‘ which discussed trends in early-stage biotech investment. Currently, Mr. Kessel is composing an article for Nature Biotechnology regarding challenges in the pharmaceutical sector, and the business development initiatives designed to deal with them. This report will attempt to summarize the talk given by Mr. Kessel to a group of ~20 graduate students and young professionals, and the information he shared will be incorporated into his upcoming article.
Current Problems within the Pharmaceutical Industry
In the future, business development functions will hold the key to success for large pharma, which is composed of the top 15-20 largest pharmaceutical companies worldwide. The well worn traditional model, which has focused on short term successes, is limiting new breakthroughs in R&D. The traditional model for big pharma is as follows: identify new blockbuster compounds, conduct large phase III clinical trials, and mass market approved drugs to the developed world. However, Mr. Kessel asks if this model can really address the world’s current unmet need for new drugs and continued to describe hurdles facing the industry today and in the future. With pipelines becoming depleted, development costs increasing and a timeline of 10-15 years to market, the US pharma industry is encountering strong earning constraints. Unfortunately, Wall Street evaluates companies based primarily on their short term gains and punishes them for not meeting quarterly expectations. This is in contrast to investment in China which is following a controlled and purposeful ten year plan. From 2009-2014 there will be $130b lost in sales by big pharma due to products going off patent. Companies such as Pfizer are buying other companies (i.e. Wyeth), not to replenish their pipeline, but to increase their earnings in order to satisfy investors. In fact, parts of their R&D pipeline are actually being shut down. There has been an increase in direct-to-consumer advertising, which should be examined more carefully and may be promoting products inappropriately. There is growing pressure from generic manufacturers. The FDA has been under increasing scrutiny to look more closely at safety, and the regulatory environment is becoming tougher. For example, Mr. Kessel asked the audience a rhetorical question: do you think the FDA would approve an oncology compound that has been demonstrated to extend life for several weeks, but produces horrendous side effects? The FDA is under Congressional oversight, and there are concerns about how the industry is conducting itself. Another question: If the customer is currently paying $0.10/pill, would they pay $1.00/pill next year for a drug which provides marginal benefit? Mr. Kessel suspects that patients might not be willing to pay more for incremental benefits during these times of budgetary constraints. He wonders if consumers will even be able to buy the drugs they have been paying for in the past. In an effort to demonstrate the direction in which the healthcare industry is moving, Mr. Kessel shares the example of HUMANA. This is an example of an insurance provider and payer, which is currently collaborating with another company BG Medicines to discover and implement biomarkers for patients. One of the overarching problems with non-personalized medicine is that drugs will often benefit only a minority of patients afflicted with an illness. It would be ideal to target those who will respond to therapy and identify them with biomarkers, and avoid dosing patients who will be non-responders. Insurance companies are willing to pay for the test, and patients who don’t carry the markers will not get the drugs, increasing efficiency while reducing side effects and costs.

Mr. Kessel foresees a convergence of the FDA and EMA (European Medicines Agency), with a greater focus on safety which will slow down the approval process. All drugs have a safety/toxicity trade off. In the US, we are looking for perfect safety. However, in some fields, we have deemed side effects acceptable, such as oncology. The future will show an increased focus on longevity. However, big pharma is not prepared to capture new innovation, due to their corporate structure and administrative weaknesses. Their strength lies in their ability to recognize and capture external breakthroughs. There is a need to bolster drug discovery. Cutting costs to maintain earnings is not the panacea. The use of outdated business models and flip-flopping strategies i.e. diversifying pipelines/focusing on core competencies is showing inefficient and non-optimal strategic business development.
The Role of Biotech and Generics
Biotech is viewed as a collective of small and nimble companies capable of performing high level R&D. What’s happening in biotech? There are major capital shortages. Programs are being cut and slowed down. Small companies without a year of cash reserves are being unduly punished by the market. There were 17 bankruptcies in the biotech sector last year, which is more than Mr. Kessel had seen in any year since he began practicing law several decades ago. VC’s have moved their interest to late stage compounds. Biotech is looking to big pharma for capital. The biotech industry is trying to distinguish themselves from large pharma - they don’t want to be “tainted” and need to retain their image and ability to charge as much as possible for their products.
China, Brazil, India, and Russia are viewed as rapidly growing global markets. Consumers in those nations will be frequently purchasing from primary generics producers - Pfizer, Teva, Sanofi. They are willing to pay more for name brand generics, which have increased perceived safety assurances. They are frequently opposed to generics produced in their home country. Most new compounds in development are coming out of the US. China will soon have a robust pipeline, as well. Their is a diminishing pack of Phase III compounds to pursue, creating a very small universe for pharma. There are many in-licensing deals occurring. The number of new compounds produced has been cut in half, while the budget spent on bringing them to market has doubled. Compounds which are in-licensed should be deployed. The need to maintain earnings is the most pressing issue for management. Pharma has the cash on hand, this is not the problem. However, that cash is only generating 2% interest sitting in the bank. For example, pharma is engaging in share buyback programs and purchasing outstanding shares with cash in order to control their per share income (less shares creates more revenue per share when revenue is held constant). Shareholders expect their investment to go towards innovation, instead of buying a financial instrument.

Approaches to Addressing Cutting Edge Science
Companies are assessing the cutting edge science being produced at academic institutions. VC is focusing less on early state companies. Pharma has set up their own VC wing. Sometimes they outsource their VC arm to third parties. They are investing in companies that have new platforms. Accelerator programs, such as Lilly’s Chorus have been developed as independent divisions to carry out drug development until Phase III, independent of corporate management. These divisions are sometimes spun out as new companies. There are new partnering deals occurring, drugs are becoming pre-partnered. Other companies are even experiencing foreign take overs.
How did Big Pharma Become the Partner of Choice?
The ultimate solution would be to combine the best of biotech with the best of pharma. Biotech has the entrepreneurial spirit, which can move fast and make quick decisions. Pharma has a global sales force in place, are experts with large clinical trials, regulatory affairs and has cash on hand. Pfizer has attempted a hybrid approach by creating a unique business development unit for each of its therapeutic areas, independent of each other. However, to change big pharma there needs to be a mandate from the top which awards risk taking. These companies are not taking on great compounds in order to avoid risk. Mr. Kessel suggests a change in compensation which allows leaders to shed their “risk avoidance” behavior. He mentions that “no one has ever been fired for not taking on a great compound”, but one can sure be fired for not getting their compound to pass FDA approval. Management consultants, such as McKinsey could be used to help change the corporate culture, though this often takes 5-10 years. There needs to be a creative approach to deal making which helps support innovation on the drug development side. The one size fits all approach needs to be dismissed, and the industry needs to consider new areas of opportunity. For example, the healthcare IT industry is developing databases on how patients respond to various compounds based on previous clinical trials. This could be used in the future to predict the human response to new drugs and streamline the regulatory pathway.
Final Comments
Biotech traditionally suffers from poor management, in that they don’t abandon their failing compounds early enough. Many opportunities still remain for large in-licensing deals (20-90 deals next year). Biosimilars will play an important role, though there will be less of them with more focus on generics. In the future, diversification will be key. Productivity will get worse and we will look to biotech for compounds. The Novartis Model will become more common, as big pharma purchases branded generics, consolidates, and acquires.
Tags: · biotech, Education, pharma

This year the 2010 National Association for Graduate-Professional Students (NAGPS) held their Northeast Regional Conference in the beautiful city of Pittsburgh, PA. NAGPS is non-profit, student run organization which functions to represent graduate student interests on a national platform. The NAGPS mission is develop a graduate-professional student network, provide useful resources to grad students, and advocate at the national level on their behalf. This year I was elected to chair of the Employment Concerns Committee at the national conference in Lincoln, NE. I am chairing the Employment Concerns Committee which is carrying out several surveys this year to better understand graduate student stipends, benefits, and career development.

University of Pittsburgh - Tower of Knowledge
At this regional conference in Pittsburgh, we had two days of seminars, talks, and brain storming sessions co-hosted by the University of Pittsburgh and Carnegie Mellon. My trip was sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate Student Organization and the Graduate School. Friday afternoon and evening events were help on the UPitt main campus and included a talk by comic artist and author of PhD Comics, Jorge Cham, which unfortunately I couldn’t attend. Saturday’s sessions were held on the Carnegie Mellon campus, and the weather was totally amazing. Their campus has some really nice spots, and I would highly recommend visiting it. UPitt was essentially situated directly in the center of Pittsburgh and integrated into the city itself. There were hundreds of college students walking around, as it was the last day of classes, and lounging in the grass until a brief thundershower came and chased everyone away. I left Pittsburgh back for NY on Sunday afternoon and has just enough time to see the Phipp’s Conservatory and Botanical Gardens. Saturday night featured a wine tasting co-sponsored by both university’s graduate student associations held at the Pittsburgh Zoo & Aquarium.


Rich Fitzgerald - Allegheny County Council President delivering talk at Sunday morning “Pancakes and Politics” at U of Pitt.
Sunday morning, we were privy to a special session of “Pancakes and Politics” organized by Daniel Jimenez, President of the U of Pitt Graduate Student Association. The invited speaker was Rich Fitzgerald, President of the Allegheny Town Council. Rick spoke primarily to the benefits of natural gas extraction in the Allegheny County region around Pittsburgh, and how revenue derived from this process could be used to lower property taxes. He fielded many questions from students regarding the application of alternative energy technologies in lieu of natural gas, which he was not supportive of. Afterwords, I was able to speak with him on the side about some of the issues surrounding wind power and sustainable energy generation, which he kindly listened to. Daniel Jimenez ran for a local position for the Democratic Party in Pittsburgh this year, which was great experience. He is well known for leading the charge against the Pittsburgh “Tuition Tax”.

University of Pittsburgh Student Union
Besides all this sightseeing (I have a few more pictures to share also), we actually did cover alot of ground and do alot of work. I delivered one presentation and lead another brainstorming session. The first presentation covered recent developments and lobbying efforts of Stony Brook University staff and students regarding the proposed New York State Public Higher Education and Investment Act - PHEEIA (Governor Patterson’s Press Release). The brainstorming session I lead was on the two projects we have in development in the Employment Concerns Committee, and we focused on the first project which is nearing launch. It is a nationwide survey to determine best practices at University Career Centers.
NAGPS Employment Concerns Committee - Career Center Analysis and Survey






The conference itself was a huge success with attendees from over a dozen schools featuring many new member institutions. If you have any questions about NAGPS or would like to know more about the Employment Concerns Career Center Survey you can contact me at ecc@nagps.org.
Finally, may favorite pictures were taken on the last day at the Phipp’s Conservatory. I will end this post with some of my pictures taken hastily on Sunday morning. I was able to fit in a visit to these botanical gardens after I checked out of my hotel, but before my flight. Talk about efficiency! Enjoy!

Orchids

Plantings

The Hobbits

The Sun Room

The Cloister Garden

Phipp’s Conservatory during thunderstorm
I had the most amazing experience at Phipp’s Botanical Gardens. While I was walking there, I noticed the skies were clouding and thought to myself that thunderstorms could be brewing. In that case, I would be caught without my umbrella or rain coat since everything was packed and at the hotel. I pressed ahead anyway, and while inside the stunning glass greenhouses, it began to pour. I real torrential rain and thunderstorm! It was quite an experience walking through a greenhouse during a thunderstorm. The winds picked up and began gushing a cool breeze throughout the previously warm and humid terrariums. Rain started coming inside though the various pores in the ceiling. It was an amazing experience that will never be duplicated for me. I was lucky enough to call the hotel shuttle who picked me up and got me to the airport safe and sound! For free! thank you Holiday Inn of Pittsburgh - Five Stars!
Tags: · photos, Pittsburgh, travel

We’ve all had our fair share of travel experience. But how many of us can claim they know how to haggle in an Egyptian street market? How about getting the cheapest flights around or picking the right gear? The site http://www.nomadicmatt.com/ is a great source for those who want to take a quick peek at some of the options out there. Even for the veteran frequent flyer, there is always something new to learn and besides, the travel blog is a great outlet for creativity! This reminds me, I need to update my own site and include some of my own recent adventures up here. Enjoy!
Tags: · travel
Wednesday, April 21th at 8PM - The Staller Center, Main Stage
Bruce Engel, Maestro

Tags: · concerts, Stony Brook
Taking Your Career Path Beyond the Zebra Path
 |
Well, I have been extremely tardy in updating my blog. For that, I apologize. In fact, I am so late, I am posting an advertisement for an event which already happened. However, from the post I think you will still be able to read about the event and learn about the speakers, who were extremely interesting. It was a complete success - we had good attendance, the speakers gained invaluable experience, and the audience, including myself, learned alot about the career paths of these two unique Stony Brook University alumni.
The talk was organized by the HERA Group at Stony Brook University. The University Career Center helped us advertise on their website, as well. Below, I’ve included the speaker’s bios and will just give a few points of advice the speakers gave out. Adam DeRosa suggested that if you are doing a PhD to find a young advisor who is trying to publish as much as possible. Luke Suroweic suggested hitting as many networking events as possible with your suit on, business cards and resume out - that is how he got his first internship. And the rest is history! |
Life After Stony Brook: Taking Your Career Path Beyond the Zebra Path
Organized by the HERA Group
by Stony Brook Alumni Luke Surowiec and Adam DeRosa
Wednesday, March 3, 2010 @ 3PM
Wang Center, Room 201
Free Coffee and Snacks!
Supported by the Career Center and GSO
View the PDF
Ever wonder how your degree will lead to a career? Are you interested in what happens when you graduate? Ever wonder how other people get to where they are today? Then you may want to attend ‘Life After Stony Brook organized by the HERA Group.
As a group of students in interested in science and technology, that’s just …what we decided to ask two recent Stony Brook Alums. Join Luke Suroweic and Adam DeRosa as they discuss their careers after graduating from Stony Brook. From Green technology to intellectual property and business management, ‘Taking Your Career Path Beyond the Zebra Path’ will talk about these graduates careers in environment, sustainability, science, new business, and law. Come here what Luke and Adam have to say about life after Stony Brook and ask some questions!
Sponsored by the Stony Brook GSO.
Speaker’s Bios
Luke Surowiec graduated from Stony Brook University in 2008 with an MBA (Marketing Concentration) and BA (Environmental Studies Major, Biology Minor) as one of the first participants of the fast-track MBA program. During his studies, he completed internships in energy efficiency, green design, biofuels, and environmental remediation. Since graduating, Luke has held two very different positions in both an environmental consulting firm and as project manager for a building and general contracting firm. As an environmental consultant, Luke supported the EPA with a variety of projects and helped establish their new sustainability management consulting practice by conducting marketing research as well as business and product development. Along the way, Luke learned of a unique opportunity to shift gears and contribute to the growing field of green building and is in the early stages of launching a green enterprise.
Adam DeRosa began his academic career at Loyola University in Baltimore, MD where he graduated with a BS in biology and a minor in business administration while conducting research at John’s Hopkins University and the University of Maryland. Adam graduated from Stony Brook University’s graduate program in genetics in four years and co-authored eight scientific publications, four as first author. Adam continued his research as a post doctoral fellow in the Department of Physiology and Biophysics publishing twice more. Following his interests in biology and law, Adam began his career as a Licensing Associate in the Office of Technology Licensing and Industry Relations (OTLIR) at Stony Brook where he identifies, protects, and commercializes intellectual property developed by university researchers in the fields of health science, genetics, physiology and biophysics. Since joining OTLIR in 2008, Adam has developed expertise in translational research and business development strategies focusing on IP management, technology commercialization and assessment, intellectual property contract law, and licensing negotiations.
Below are some pictures from the event.
Upcoming Spring 2010 Lecture Series
Human Evolution by Frederick Grine: Wednesday, April 7, 2010 @ 3PM
Stem Cell Research by Nurit Ballas: Wednesday, May 5, 2010 @ 3PM
Tags: · Alternative Energy, IP, jobs
On Thursday, February 11th I was privileged to meet NYS Comptroller Tom DiNapoli and his birthday party and 2010 fundraiser. I was invited to the event my Jim McAsey, of CWA 1104 to speak on behalf of graduate students at Stony Brook University. The event was very crowded and filled with local politicians, their staff, regional business leaders, and organized labor union executives. Specifically, we were there to speak to the Comptroller about our experience negotiating a contract with the Research Foundation of the SUNY. He was very supportive, and I look forward to staying in touch with him and the other representatives I met that evening.

Westri Stalder, Tom DiNapoli and Matthew Engel
Tags: · Education, New York, politics, Stony Brook